Monthly Archive for June, 2008

Brasília on the Web2.0Wednesday


Brasília, my hometown.
I was born in Brasília, I grew up there, I’m raising my kids there.
Brasilia so distant now
Brasilia of unique architecture, a planned city becoming mature in unexpected ways
Brasilia, gastronomic, cultural, bureaucratic, green, concrete in appearance
A city of immigrants built in the 1950s
Inaugurated in 1960.
Brasilia still to become Whatever we want it to be
Brasilia, my hometown which I long for
Brasilia, My beloved city that I’ll always call home.
_____________________________________
Although the album had already been prepared some time ago, I took this chance to mix it and remix it with the great incentive of sharing with my blogger buddies. Here’s my contribution to the fun Web2.0Wednesdays.
In 2006, my students produced a podcast about Brasília that you can listen to here. _____________________________________
I’m currently living in Key West, so here’s the Voicethread I created some time ago for my students about Key West.

Here are some of my Key West photos.
 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast [0:21m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

The Web2.0 in 64 seconds

Hard to explain something so complex in seconds, but the Web2.0Wednesday activity pushed me to try, to see what came up, how I saw the Web2.0.
Here it goes. It’s certainly an oversimplification of reality, but the essence is there.

Spinning Mind through Online Social Connections

My mind is spinning. I wish I could have more hands, time to blog about so many projects, ideas, insights and encounters I’ve had in just one day. As I cannot change reality, I’ll just jot down snippets of what I’ve seen around.

Web 2.0 Wednesdays

Here they come again with a wonderful idea. Michele Martin, one of our fantastic mentors in the Comment Challenge, has listened to the group and will start tomorrow a Web 2.0 Wednesdays. This is the idea:
Each Wednesday I’m going to post a Web 2.0 activity for you to try. If you have the time and inclination to do so, then please join in. If you don’t–the activity just doesn’t do it for you or you’re too busy with other thing or whatever–then don’t worry about it. Wait until the next time. This is not, repeat NOT, something to put on your “to do” list and feel badly if you don’t get to. I don’t want to read any posts that say “I’m behind on the Web 2.0 Wednesday activity,” because it’s not meant to be that kind of thing. Seriously. This is low pressure learning.
This sounds just a perfect follow up to the interactions, connections that were started during the Comment Challenge month. However, what’s best is that anyone can join with no pressure at all, just the fun of being learning and sharing discoveries with others. So, why don’t you join us?
______________

Digging Diigo – Exploring Online Social Bookmarking

It’s a wonderful learning opportunity and a great pleasure to have been invited by Gladys Baya, the creator of the learningwithcomputers group, to moderate a month on a topic that might interest the group. I chose bookmarking. In fact, I was going to talk about delicious, which I was familiar with, but Diigo allured me in a good, social sense. So, Susana Canelo and I took the plunge and started yesterday to dig Diigo with the learningwithcomputers members.
http://learningwithcomputers07.pbwiki.com/online_bookmarking
It’s already in full swing. Members are joining our Diigo group, interacting and actively participating in the forum. This opportunity pushes me to further explore collectively the limitless possibilities of creating meaning in a group thro
ugh the connections between links, tags and brilliant minds. A challenge!
Anyone is more than welcome to join us there.
learningwithcomputers Diigo LearningwithComputers Group
___________

The Rhizomatic Model of Learning

Today I attended to a crowded online presentation by Dave Cormier. I was really interested in listening to what he had to say a
s I read his article in Innovate, Community as Curriculum. What he talks about is exactly what I see happening in the two amazing Communities of and for Practice I’m part of, the Webheads and the LearningwithComputers groups.
A rhizomatic plant has no center and no defined boundary; rather, it is made up of a number of semi-independent nodes, each of which is capable of growing and spreading on its own, bounded only by the limits of its habitat (Cormier 2008). In the rhizomatic view, knowledge can only be negotiated, and the contextual, collaborative learning experience shared by constructivist and connectivist pedagogies is a social as well as a personal knowledge-creation process with mutable goals and constantly negotiated premises.
He goes on with his views on the nature of online learning.
In the rhizomatic
model of learning, curriculum is not driven by predefined inputs from experts; it is constructed and negotiated in real time by the contributions of those engaged in the learning process. This community acts as the curriculum, spontaneously shaping, constructing, and reconstructing itself and the subject of its learning in the same way that the rhizome responds to changing environmental conditions.
I see this happening all the time with the webheads and learningwithcomputers circles. The group, the connections, and interactions shape the construction of meaning. Members suggest, test, explore, discover, make sense, create meaning, build knowledge. There’s no expert. There’s a collective willingness to learn and explore and from this point everyone is prompted to contribute. What the group wants to learn shapes the kind of knowledge the group will get. I guess this is exactly Dave’s point of contextual knowledge.

However, I still feel it’s so distant from my physical reality…In my school, most of educators have no clue of the potential the virtual world holds in sharing, building, re-shaping, mixing and remixing concepts, ideas, meaning. I feel part of an utopia totally disconnected from what I see happening to education in general. This question was asked to Dave, but I think there’s no simple answer:
How would learners and educators be engaged in the rhizomatic model of learning?
My head is spinning!
Cormier, D. 2008. Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate 4 (5). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=550 (accessed June 17, 2008)

The True Value of Ning?

I’ve been mulling over for some days now what I read @Injenuity. Jennifer Jones wrote a compelling post about “Being Trapped in a Ning
She mentions:
I have found that my most rewarding online connections are with people I know where to find when I need them. The tool doesn’t even matter. I’ve learned their habits and can locate them in a space where they are most comfortable interacting. There are people I’m connected with through gmail chat, skype, twitter, blogs, email and other networks, but I’ve learned which arena works best for communicating with each of them. For my Twitter contacts, I can quickly check their status on Twitter, and if they’re around, I’ll contact them through the method that works best. My colleagues all have preferred contact methods. I have some instructors who only use the phone, others email.
At the end of the year, I created the Ning group for my online students and blogged about it saying that Ning was the place where learning happened. http://explorations.bloxi.jp/a/ning-wher…
However, I must agree with Jennifer. Learning is not in Ning. It’s everywhere. When people already have their own spaces of self-expression, if they started blogging somewhere else, it’s like as if they’re dispersing their thoughts instead of aggregating them. For example, I love the fact that in the blogging4educators Ning, whenever we want we can start a forum discussion, or share something there. However, people already have their preferred way of sharing and collaborating. So, aren’t we forcing them into a relationship that existed before? Do we need to be in the “same room” to be tied and dialogging? Of course not. That’s why I feel now that I was pushing the members there, but, in fact, our bonds were already strong in other online spaces. I still like the idea of having everybody there and knowing that whenever needed we can just send a message to the network with something interesting. But, yes, Jen, what really matters is aggregating conversations and building up knowledge using each one’s favorite means and not forcing people into a digital trap. I do hope that the members in the blogging4educators don’t feel this way. I do hope that if they decided to join the group is because they saw value in it. However, it is worth speaking up our minds and questioning our practices. As for my students, it’s a different case in the sense that most of them don’t have an online presence in their learning process. They have their favorite social networks, but they consider it a different domain of socialization, not for learning, though they might be learning valuable skills. So, Ning, can focus their attention to the learning process. But, again, I have had such amazing interactions through emails, skype chats, Orkut messages with them that we might be trapped in some way. They might feel I don’t want to communicate in another digital medium, which is certainly not true. They are mostly busy adults who prefer to receive an email. Some will give me feedback and keep conversations. Others read my personal blog.
Ning is still an appealing place for learning and sharing, and I’ve had invaluable interactions there. For example, Celso, a former student, has been reporting his learning journey abroad in a forum, Marcelo talks about his news professional challenges in a blog.However, it only works if it’s the group willingness to interact there, and not us trapping a group of brilliant minds in a space that they don’t feel as theirs. It shouldn’t be unilateral where one person is trying to feed the group with information, resources, ideas, but an interactive space. If it’s not, maybe we’re using the wrong tool for the right purpose. Then, we’re missing the wonderful input each one can contribute in a network.
In the case of my online students, I know that some of them have fully profited from it and I have, as well. But, now, I think, couldn’t we keep having enriching connectivity where we started, on our class blog? A lot of food for thought there. I still believe in the power of Ning, but with more critical eyes, pondering its true value for networking. I’ll keep exploring it to have a clearer view how it’s useful in my professional development and in my students’ learning path.
Michele Martin discusses the issue in the Bamboo Project Blog. She sees the value of Ning for new users of social media, the ones who still don’t have their own blogs, or don’t use RSS to keep connected to others in their network. As I mentioned above, this is exactly the case when some of my students profit from Ning. Their shared space become a sandbox for their self-expression. It can be the spark they need to speak up their minds and find the tone of their potent voices. .

Replying to Comment Challengers

Dear Colin, Inês, Sue and Kevin,
Here’s my reply to you all about the Comment Challenge. Thanks for inspiring me to go even further now!

The Comment Challenge is Just Beginning

We all wish we had more time to explore, comment, post. Not perfect worlds, but this month was filled of ideas on how we can keep the flow of conversations into a deeper, more meaningful level in our blogs. My participation was imperfect, but this doesn’t mean I haven’t gone far. The comment challenge girls, Sue Waters, Kim Cofino, Michele Martin, and Silvia Tosano were just everywhere showing by skillful commenting strategies how to keep distributed conversations aggregated in clusters of meaning. Participants had a variety of levels of engagement, but each learned what he/she needed to apprehend at the time of the challenge.
For me, the challenge was just the spark for further explorations. No, it’s not over! Finding ways and time to connect is a multi-faceted process. You go far, there’s even more to discover. Ideally, it’s time now for us to keep using the skills, strategies, ideas we’ve been exploring in the blogosphere. However, I feel we should go on exploring possibilities as a group as we’ve done so far. I don’t know how, but maybe still using the tag and the cocomment sharing system to highlight new blogs, interesting posts, comments worth reading? Well, I’m speaking up my mind…
My top 5 lessons from this wonderful commenting experience?
  • Connections keep coming in different ways
  • A simple idea can take a bunch of very busy educators to go beyond, always beyond
  • Keep commenting. New nodes of learning are formed by the connections generated in the comment area.
  • There are people interested in what you have to say. Keep blogging.
  • I’m thinking of a totally new approach to next year’s blogging4educators Electronic Village workshop due to the input I’ve gotten from the challenge.
I’d like to thank everybody who enriched my professional development, my days, my life with such meaningful comment connections!
The challenge has just begun.


Monty Wordpress Bayesian Spam Filter has blocked 99982 access attempts.