She mentions:
I have found that my most rewarding online connections are with people I know where to find when I need them. The tool doesn’t even matter. I’ve learned their habits and can locate them in a space where they are most comfortable interacting. There are people I’m connected with through gmail chat, skype, twitter, blogs, email and other networks, but I’ve learned which arena works best for communicating with each of them. For my Twitter contacts, I can quickly check their status on Twitter, and if they’re around, I’ll contact them through the method that works best. My colleagues all have preferred contact methods. I have some instructors who only use the phone, others email.At the end of the year, I created the Ning group for my online students and blogged about it saying that Ning was the place where learning happened. http://explorations.bloxi.jp/a/ning-wher…
However, I must agree with Jennifer. Learning is not in Ning. It’s everywhere. When people already have their own spaces of self-expression, if they started blogging somewhere else, it’s like as if they’re dispersing their thoughts instead of aggregating them. For example, I love the fact that in the blogging4educators Ning, whenever we want we can start a forum discussion, or share something there. However, people already have their preferred way of sharing and collaborating. So, aren’t we forcing them into a relationship that existed before? Do we need to be in the “same room” to be tied and dialogging? Of course not. That’s why I feel now that I was pushing the members there, but, in fact, our bonds were already strong in other online spaces. I still like the idea of having everybody there and knowing that whenever needed we can just send a message to the network with something interesting. But, yes, Jen, what really matters is aggregating conversations and building up knowledge using each one’s favorite means and not forcing people into a digital trap. I do hope that the members in the blogging4educators don’t feel this way. I do hope that if they decided to join the group is because they saw value in it. However, it is worth speaking up our minds and questioning our practices.
As for my students, it’s a different case in the sense that most of them don’t have an online presence in their l
earning process. They have their favorite social networks, but they consider it a different domain of socialization, not for learning, though they might be learning valuable skills. So, Ning, can focus their attention to the learning process. But, again, I have had such amazing interactions through emails, skype chats, Orkut messages with them that we might be trapped in some way. They might feel I don’t want to communicate in another digital medium, which is certainly not true. They are mostly busy adults who prefer to receive an email. Some will give me feedback and keep conversations. Others read my personal blog.Ning is still an appealing place for learning and sharing, and I’ve had invaluable interactions there. For example, Celso, a former student, has been reporting his learning journey abroad in a forum, Marcelo talks about his news professional challenges in a blog.However, it only works if it’s the group willingness to interact there, and not us trapping a group of brilliant minds in a space that they don’t feel as theirs. It shouldn’t be unilateral where one person is trying to feed the group with information, resources, ideas, but an interactive space. If it’s not, maybe we’re using the wrong tool for the right purpose. Then, we’re missing the wonderful input each one can contribute in a network.
In the case of my online students, I know that some of them have fully profited from it and I have, as well. But, now, I think, couldn’t we keep having enriching connectivity where we started, on our class blog? A lot of food for thought there. I still believe in the power of Ning, but with more critical eyes, pondering its true value for networking. I’ll keep exploring it to have a clearer view how it’s useful in my professional development and in my students’ learning path.
Michele Martin discusses the issue in the Bamboo Project Blog. She sees the value of Ning for new users of social media, the ones who still don’t have their own blogs, or don’t use RSS to keep connected to others in their network. As I mentioned above, this is exactly the case when some of my students profit from Ning. Their shared space become a sandbox for their self-expression. It can be the spark they need to speak up their minds and find the tone of their potent voices. .
Great reflection on your own experiences! In terms of using it for a classroom, how do you feel about what happens with the content after the class is over? Do you feel it should still continue to exist? Who should moderate it, or should it just flow naturally until extinction?
I wonder if your experiences aren’t also part of a larger issue I see going on with learning communities–most people still operate within this paradigm that learning is driven by teachers. That is, people will respond to a question you ask, but only a few will ask one of their own. They’ll do an assignment you make up, but won’t make up assignments for themselves.
I’ve also observed that because someone has to create the network and Ning plasters their name and face everywhere, it’s harder to create a sense of group ownership–whoever created the network is perceived as being “in charge,” and it’s difficult to get them to feel that it belongs to everyone.
Thanks for sharing your reflections here–very interesting stuff!
That’s exactly the point, Michele. My students are mainly highly-anxious-low-tech adults used to the traditional view of learning in which the teacher is the provider of content and is always “teaching”. Throughout the course, I try to show them that learning is a collective effort and I’m not an expert giving a lecture, but still their views on learning and teaching don’t change overnight. It takes time. I think that by the end of the six week period, they have a better understanding of what I mean, but still they expect me to lead them with a few exceptions, the ones who really understand that they are in charge of their learning process for real.And, in Jen’s words, I feel trapped, obliged to correspond to their expectations. It’s a matter of changing my own behavior there…
Also, what you mentioned about us being “the creator” of the network may give participants the wrong impression even if it happens in a subconscious level. This is even more true if you consider, for example, the blogging4educators ning group. We are a group of 9 co-moderators. However, it might cause the other co-moderators not to be so actively engaged because I am the one “in charge”, which is not true at all, as we’re a great team who have been collaborating constantly.
I also thoroughly enjoyed your post as it resonates with my own views. Let us keep exploring Ning and seeing where it adds value to the network.
Hi and thanks. It’s interesting as it reflects on an issue we are all facing and which cuts through all debate from e-portfolios to blogging. It’s good to see these dialouges starting in the education space too.
thanks
Harriet, so true. This discussion goes much beyond the potential of Ning in strengthening (or not) our networks. It certainly goes deeper into subjects of ownership, authorship, traditional learning/teaching practices mixed with web2.0 pedagogy (?)/literacy. And the list goes on, but certainly the edublogosphere is the perfect place to keep these conversations, and just by writing about it, it had had a tremendous reflective impact on me. Have you used Ning? What are your feelings about it?